And when it does two periods would be at the end.) But i think at least the article name should be "fun." regardless and add a notice (similar to how we add those notices like "X redirects here, for more info look at X (disambiguation)) to show why we cant use the common name in sentences structure.
For example, the band "fun." (its more common and simple name is instead "Fun (band)" because the claim is it contradicts common english, yet somehow allow "Strawberry Panic!!" Now i can understand if it makes it difficult for sentence structure (one would assume the sentence ended on fun. The problem what i have with WP:Trademark is how inconsistent it seems. Wikipedia allows the first letter to be lowercased, but what i find more out of place is the capital V in mid title since it doesnt seem to be any acronyym.
#Oovoo logos manual
Croctotheface ( talk) 20:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Manual Disambiguation vs. The other questions you have should probably just be hashed out on a case-by-case basis. Lucia Black ( talk) 20:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC) At some point in the next few days, I'll look to make some changes along the lines of what you're suggesting that remove the "inventing" bit. Perhaps we can just leave the "invented" stuff out, and instead go with some variation on, "Choose from among styles used in secondary sources"? Croctotheface ( talk) 20:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC) I can support that.- New questions? 20:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC) As I have stated previously (see above discussion), the only thing about this is that we should be clear about exactly what kinds of secondary sources we are using, and what does this mean if we can't find a secondary source that follows our exact guidelines in the "list of principles."- New questions? 20:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Sounds reasonable.i also support. Clearly, the style used by the New York Times and other major publications is not what we mean by an invented style. It seems that "don't invent new styles" may be doing this here. From what some people have said, though, this particular line may be creating issues out in "the field." Sometimes, when you have a guideline like this one that inspires a degree of reflexive dislike ("My favorite band is BAP, not Bap! I use a RAZR, not a Razr!"), editors will look to any language in the guideline that they think might give them an "out" to do what they want. It was a compromise to clarify that individual editors should not make some style up themselves that doesn't exist in the sources. I remember when we put the "don't invent new ones" language in there. I've been active to varying degrees on this talk page for a while.
Should we use a different descriptor besides "invented"?
4 "Reliable secondary sources" parenthetical.1 Should we use a different descriptor besides "invented"?.I will be deleting this and researching a new app to download. I'm so irritated and disappointed that I have to deal with this at a time that was supposed to be a quick way for my daughter to contact me while I was away. For something that was easy to use, its now incredibly confusing. I then had a notification which said i had a missed call from my daughter but didn't show a time stamp for that either, just gave an option to call back. When I send a message it just disappears instead of showing up as a thread. After having an extremely hard time logging in and needing to change my pw several times before being able to log in, i realized it no longer shows a text history, date and time stamp. We hadn't been on in a few months and the interface had apparently changed. During this time, the app was great, she could send text messages call me etc and it was easy and fun to use. I downloaded and had been using ovoo since 2015 specifically to communicate with my daughter (9) through her ipad if she she need to contact me for any reason.
0 kommentar(er)
